Hand off the boring tickets. Keep the hard engineering.
Kosuke runs your codebase in a live sandbox so PMs, designers, and marketing ship small tickets themselves. No blind diffs from background agents, just tested work you can actually merge.

Everyengineerknowsthefeeling.Youopenyoursprintboardandmostofitisn'tengineering.Abuttoncolor.Atooltiprewrite.Onemorefieldonthesignupform.Theticketsthateatyourdaybeforeyougettoanythingthatmatters.Kosuketakesthemoffyourplate,inalivesandboxofyourtechstack.Youreview.Youapprove.Youmerge.Backtorealengineering.
of tickets you shouldn't be touching
Not another background agent.
Hand off the bullshit tickets
Copy tweaks, feature flags, new form fields, marketing changes. The small stuff that breaks your flow every time but blocks everyone else until it ships. Let your team take it from ticket to PR. You review the diff when it lands.
A preview, not a promise
Every change spins up a live preview wired to your code, your DB, your env. Your PM sees it, tests it, iterates until it's right, then opens the PR. You review work that's already been QA'd, not a blind diff from a headless agent.
Your architecture, respected
Kosuke picks up your patterns from the repo itself. Your structure, your components, and the house rules you've documented for your team. Every change feels like your team wrote it. You're reviewing changes, not reformatting them.
Configure once. Ship forever.
Connect your repo, spin up the sandbox, set your conventions once. Every ticket after that runs inside those boundaries. Your team shipping, you reviewing only what matters.
Why not just use Claude Code?
Because your PM shouldn't need to configure a local development environment to fix a typo.
Why not just use Linear Agents or Cursor Agents?
Because a PR without a preview is useless for non-technical people.
A diff isn't a preview. The PM can't tell if it's right, and the engineer becomes the bottleneck.
Engineers review code that's already been tested. Just a clean PR, ready to merge.
Works with your favorite stack.
Frontend
10 stacksBackend
14 stacksData
6 stacksNot seeing your stack? Contact us.
Ship demos, not meetings.
When every branch is a live environment, your whole team moves faster.
Demo without engineers
Every sandbox is a shareable link. Product shows customers, Sales demos to prospects, CS walks clients through workflows. No engineer required.
Non-technical teammates ship
Hand off copy changes and config tweaks to PMs. You focus on architecture.
QA without sync
Every PR is a live preview. No more "deploy to staging" requests.
Enterprise-ready
In ProgressBuilt for compliance.
Designed for SOC 2, GDPR, and HIPAA standards.
The first Cloud IDE built for the agents era
No more worktrees. No more port conflicts. Run up to five agents in parallel, each in its own live cloud sandbox. Share a preview link, review the code, and merge when it's ready.
Every change, tested on camera
Agents don't just write code. They exercise it. Every flow runs in a real browser, gets recorded start to finish, and the video is attached right to the pull request, so reviewers watch what happened before they merge.
- Runs in a real browserAgents drive your app with real clicks, forms, and navigation against a live sandbox.
- Recorded end to endEvery flow is captured on video, so you see exactly what the agent saw.
- Attached to the PRThe recording lands in the pull request description. Watch the proof, then merge.
kosuke bot attached a recording of the e2e run
- ✓Sign up → onboarding4.2s
- ✓Add item to cart2.8s
- ✕Checkout with coupon6.1s
Common Questions
How is Kosuke different from Claude Code?
What exactly is a "sandbox"?
How does Kosuke respect my code conventions?
Do I still have full control over what gets merged?
Does Kosuke work with monorepos and private repos?
How does Kosuke handle merge conflicts?
Won't this flood my team with PRs to review?
Is my code secure, and is there any vendor lock-in?
What's "BYOK"? Which LLM provider keys do I need?
What's Dev Mode?
Still have questions? Contact us.